https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1725924 --- Comment #9 from Steven Jay Munroe <munroesj52@xxxxxxxxx> --- > pveclib.src: W: invalid-license APACHE So you want this spelled out as "Apache Software License 2.0" or the short form "ASL 2.0" ? > pveclib.ppc64le: E: shared-lib-without-dependency-information /usr/lib64/libpvec.so.0.0.0 The current build only uses the static libraries for some unit tests. As is these libraries only contains arrays of large numeric constants. But this might change in later pveclib version are more complex operations are added. > pveclib.ppc64le: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/licenses/pveclib/COPYING LICENSE looks like I am caught on the horns of the "LICENSE" vs "COPYING" controversy: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/5678462/should-i-provide-a-license-txt-or-copying-txt-file-in-my-project The symlink avoids duplicating the file. While preserving COPYING for lint checks that insist on that file is there. Not sure why it is "dangling" because it is used in Makefile.am +dist_license_DATA = COPYING +dist_doc_DATA = CONTRIBUTING.md README.md ChangeLog.md Based on https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536209 I assumed this is what you (Fedora) wanted. I am working on the other issues. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
