https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1690046 --- Comment #21 from Dave Love <dave.love@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- I was just about to look at this after being busy/away. I don't understand the restriction to x86_64, but without a buildarch in the spec it will get built on everything anyhow. I don't see any reason to exclude the other arches, so you can just leave it at that. Yes, you can't rely on maintaining a spec for both Fedora and SUSE, and I was surprised Orion thought that was OK. The spec can get edited by others in Fedora for various reasons. You can build the doc on x86_64 el7, at least, with a trivial edit, which seems to keep the formatting <https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/loveshack/charliecloud/epel-7-x86_64/00884378-charliecloud/charliecloud.spec>. (I don't understand the missing bits which break it on ppc64le.) Thanks for the test README. I'll try to find time to run it tomorrow to check, as I should. I expect it's in reasonable shape, but you might like to consider the doc change, assuming it still works with the current version. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
