https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1711896 Elliott Sales de Andrade <quantum.analyst@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |POST Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Elliott Sales de Andrade <quantum.analyst@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Jens Petersen from comment #3) > (In reply to Elliott Sales de Andrade from comment #2) > > There are some warnings and errors from rpmlint, and I'm not sure if they > > are important or not: > > I have also seen these before. > > > ghc-microlens-mtl.x86_64: E: library-not-linked-against-libc > > /usr/lib64/libHSmicrolens-mtl-0.1.11.1-KuiQwUtjPQq9JoX7IucQt5-ghc8.4.4.so > > The funny this is that all the Haskell libraries _are_ linked to libc.so.6. > So this one looks like a false positive to me. > No, I don't think they are. For example, $ objdump -p /usr/lib64/libHSyesod-persistent-1.6.0.1-4wTcHUP28fp5PooyyID5za-ghc8.4.4.so | rg NEEDED NEEDED libHSyesod-core-1.6.9-6xOaXHWVV6P2Pmu1n9koR1-ghc8.4.4.so NEEDED libHSpersistent-2.8.2-IgkIITOhFEIEKjd43DY2bu-ghc8.4.4.so NEEDED libHSresource-pool-0.2.3.2-3qBBkHW6lxy84rjjFQESmN-ghc8.4.4.so NEEDED libHSconduit-1.3.1-JEeOwg0N2ow9OXrSdjm4NY-ghc8.4.4.so NEEDED libHSresourcet-1.2.2-LxoTdCBEv8PKBOJtxNXVvM-ghc8.4.4.so NEEDED libHStransformers-0.5.5.0-ghc8.4.4.so NEEDED libHSbase-4.11.1.0-ghc8.4.4.so NEEDED libHSghc-prim-0.5.2.0-ghc8.4.4.so > > ghc-microlens-mtl.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol > > /usr/lib64/libHSmicrolens-mtl-0.1.11.1-KuiQwUtjPQq9JoX7IucQt5-ghc8.4.4.so > > stg_ap_0_fast > > (and several other symbols) > > Yeah a lot ;) > I think this is actually the case for all Haskell packages currently. > > These are warnings but yeah I don't really know if there is any serious > implication. > Also not sure whether these are appearing due to changes in ghc, rpmlint or > other parts of the toolchain. I'll approve though, since it seems this is the status quo, but I think the warnings are not all false. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
