https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1711896 --- Comment #3 from Jens Petersen <petersen@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Elliott Sales de Andrade from comment #2) > There are some warnings and errors from rpmlint, and I'm not sure if they > are important or not: I have also seen these before. > ghc-microlens-mtl.x86_64: E: library-not-linked-against-libc > /usr/lib64/libHSmicrolens-mtl-0.1.11.1-KuiQwUtjPQq9JoX7IucQt5-ghc8.4.4.so The funny this is that all the Haskell libraries _are_ linked to libc.so.6. So this one looks like a false positive to me. > ghc-microlens-mtl.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol > /usr/lib64/libHSmicrolens-mtl-0.1.11.1-KuiQwUtjPQq9JoX7IucQt5-ghc8.4.4.so > stg_ap_0_fast > (and several other symbols) Yeah a lot ;) I think this is actually the case for all Haskell packages currently. These are warnings but yeah I don't really know if there is any serious implication. Also not sure whether these are appearing due to changes in ghc, rpmlint or other parts of the toolchain. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx