[Bug 1707080] Review Request: osmo-fl2k - Turns FL2000-based USB 3.0 to VGA adapters into low cost DACs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1707080



--- Comment #6 from Jaroslav Škarvada <jskarvad@xxxxxxxxxx> ---
(In reply to Petr Menšík from comment #5)
> (In reply to Jaroslav Škarvada from comment #3)
> > (In reply to Petr Menšík from comment #2)
> > 
> > Hopefully all fixed.
> > 
> > > * File /usr/lib/udev/rules.d/10-osmo-fl2k.rules is shipped, but its
> > > directory is not owned by package or required by the package (systemd-udev
> > > or kexec-tools).
> > > 
> > I think this is not needed [1]
> > 
> > [1]
> > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/
> > #_the_directory_is_owned_by_a_package_which_is_not_required_for_your_package_
> > to_function
> 
> In that example, it says exactly what I mentioned. You might not use
> Requires, but still have to own that directory in your package. Unowned
> directory is not permitted, even for optional content.
> 
> Solution: the evolution package should own the /usr/share/gtk-doc directory.
> There is no need to add an explicit Requires on gtk-doc solely for the
> directory ownership.
>
added udev requirement

> Also, now we have separate libs subpackage, but it has not license file
> inside and does not depend on any package that has it. I suggest moving
> %license to libs, it should be required explicitly from other subpackages
> then.
>
added license to both, move docs to libs

> Licensecheck also mentions other licenses than GPLv2+:
> 
> GNU Lesser General Public License (v2.1 or later)
> -------------------------------------------------
> osmo-fl2k-0.1.1-df33203d/src/getopt/getopt.c
> osmo-fl2k-0.1.1-df33203d/src/getopt/getopt.h
> 
> GPL (v3 or later)
> -----------------
> osmo-fl2k-0.1.1-df33203d/cmake/Modules/Version.cmake
> osmo-fl2k-0.1.1-df33203d/include/rds_mod.h
> osmo-fl2k-0.1.1-df33203d/src/rds_mod.c
> 
> getopt seems not used by our compilation, but rds_mod is. I think Licenses:
> GPLv2+ and GPLv3+ should be used.

I think it should be relicensed upstream to GPLv3+, but for now added both

Spec URL: https://jskarvad.fedorapeople.org/osmo-fl2k/osmo-fl2k.spec
SRPM URL:
https://jskarvad.fedorapeople.org/osmo-fl2k/osmo-fl2k-0.1.1-0.3.20190501gitdf33203d.fc29.src.rpm

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux