https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1701567 --- Comment #4 from Adam Borowski <kilobyte@xxxxxxxxxx> --- Spec URL: https://angband.pl/tmp/fedora/colorized-logs.spec SRPM URL: https://angband.pl/tmp/fedora/colorized-logs-2.4-1.fc30.src.rpm Done, other than for bumping release/changelog -- should they keep trace of any in-review version that hasn't been committed to any public repository? This would pollute the final package with WIP changes. But perhaps I'm wrong with applying the reasoning I'm used to in Debian to Fedora workflows? The diff from previous attempt is whitespace only, so there are no real changes to mention in this case. Is this good enough for now? For the other package (vmemcache): fedora-scm-requests got denied because "review is approved by a user that is not a packager", thus I guess it needs to be seen by someone with actual privileges. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
