[Bug 1701242] Review Request: mx5000tools - Tools for the MX5000 series keyboard

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1701242



--- Comment #4 from Antonio Trande <anto.trande@xxxxxxxxx> ---
Package Review
==============

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed


Issues:
=======
- If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a
  BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang.
  Note: No gcc, gcc-c++ or clang found in BuildRequires
  See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/C_and_C++/

  GCC is not listed as BR package but it's automatically required by libtool

- Remove Group

- Please add '%ldconfig_scriptlets libs' is you want to build even for EPEL.

- revoLUTIONconTROL/ 's license is pending

===== MUST items =====

C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: ldconfig not called in %post and %postun for Fedora 28 and later.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
[x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.

Generic:
[?]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.
[?]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
     Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
     found: "GPL (v2 or later) (with incorrect FSF address)", "Creative
     Commons CC0 Public License (v1)", "Unknown or generated". 16 files
     have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
     /home/sagitter/FedoraReview/1701242-mx5000tools/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[?]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
     names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
     Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
     (~1MB) or number of files.
     Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
     one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
     license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
     license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
     work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
     provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
     %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

===== SHOULD items =====

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
     file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
     Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in
     mx5000tools-libs , mx5000tools-devel
[ ]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
     translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
     architectures.
[-]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
     files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Uses parallel make %{?_smp_mflags} macro.
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.

===== EXTRA items =====

Generic:
[!]: Package should not use obsolete m4 macros
     Note: Some obsoleted macros found, see the attachment.
     See: https://fedorahosted.org/FedoraReview/wiki/AutoTools
[x]: Rpmlint is run on debuginfo package(s).
     Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package
     is arched.
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.


Rpmlint
-------
Checking: mx5000tools-0.1.2-1.20190407git4967881.fc31.x86_64.rpm
          mx5000tools-libs-0.1.2-1.20190407git4967881.fc31.x86_64.rpm
          mx5000tools-devel-0.1.2-1.20190407git4967881.fc31.x86_64.rpm
          mx5000tools-debuginfo-0.1.2-1.20190407git4967881.fc31.x86_64.rpm
          mx5000tools-debugsource-0.1.2-1.20190407git4967881.fc31.x86_64.rpm
          mx5000tools-0.1.2-1.20190407git4967881.fc31.src.rpm
mx5000tools.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US bluetooth ->
Bluetooth, blue tooth, blue-tooth
mx5000tools.x86_64: W: no-documentation
mx5000tools.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary mx5000-tool
mx5000tools-libs.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US appsd -> apps,
apps d, apposed
mx5000tools-libs.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US bluetooth ->
Bluetooth, blue tooth, blue-tooth
mx5000tools-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
mx5000tools-devel.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/include/libmx5000/mx5000.h
mx5000tools-devel.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/include/libmx5000/mx5000screencontent.h
mx5000tools.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US bluetooth ->
Bluetooth, blue tooth, blue-tooth
6 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 7 warnings.




Rpmlint (debuginfo)
-------------------
Checking: mx5000tools-libs-debuginfo-0.1.2-1.20190407git4967881.fc31.x86_64.rpm
          mx5000tools-debuginfo-0.1.2-1.20190407git4967881.fc31.x86_64.rpm
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.





Rpmlint (installed packages)
----------------------------
perl: warning: Setting locale failed.
perl: warning: Please check that your locale settings:
        LANGUAGE = (unset),
        LC_ALL = (unset),
        LC_CTYPE = "C.UTF-8",
        LANG = "en_US.UTF-8"
    are supported and installed on your system.
perl: warning: Falling back to the standard locale ("C").
perl: warning: Setting locale failed.
perl: warning: Please check that your locale settings:
        LANGUAGE = (unset),
        LC_ALL = (unset),
        LC_CTYPE = "C.UTF-8",
        LANG = "en_US.UTF-8"
    are supported and installed on your system.
perl: warning: Falling back to the standard locale ("C").
perl: warning: Setting locale failed.
perl: warning: Please check that your locale settings:
        LANGUAGE = (unset),
        LC_ALL = (unset),
        LC_CTYPE = "C.UTF-8",
        LANG = "en_US.UTF-8"
    are supported and installed on your system.
perl: warning: Falling back to the standard locale ("C").
sh: /usr/bin/python: No such file or directory
/usr/share/rpmlint/Pkg.py:168: UnicodeWarning: decode() called on unicode
string, see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1693751
  s.decode('UTF-8')
mx5000tools-devel.x86_64: W: invalid-url URL:
https://github.com/jwrdegoede/mx5000tools-revo <urlopen error [Errno -2] Name
or service not known>
mx5000tools-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
mx5000tools-devel.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/include/libmx5000/mx5000.h
mx5000tools-devel.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/include/libmx5000/mx5000screencontent.h
mx5000tools-debugsource.x86_64: W: invalid-url URL:
https://github.com/jwrdegoede/mx5000tools-revo <urlopen error [Errno -2] Name
or service not known>
mx5000tools.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US bluetooth ->
Bluetooth, blue tooth, blue-tooth
mx5000tools.x86_64: W: invalid-url URL:
https://github.com/jwrdegoede/mx5000tools-revo <urlopen error [Errno -2] Name
or service not known>
/usr/share/rpmlint/Pkg.py:168: UnicodeWarning: decode() called on unicode
string, see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1693751
  s.decode('UTF-8')
mx5000tools.x86_64: W: no-documentation
mx5000tools.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary mx5000-tool
mx5000tools-libs-debuginfo.x86_64: W: invalid-url URL:
https://github.com/jwrdegoede/mx5000tools-revo <urlopen error [Errno -2] Name
or service not known>
/usr/share/rpmlint/Pkg.py:168: UnicodeWarning: decode() called on unicode
string, see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1693751
  s.decode('UTF-8')
mx5000tools-debuginfo.x86_64: W: invalid-url URL:
https://github.com/jwrdegoede/mx5000tools-revo <urlopen error [Errno -2] Name
or service not known>
/usr/share/rpmlint/Pkg.py:168: UnicodeWarning: decode() called on unicode
string, see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1693751
  s.decode('UTF-8')
mx5000tools-libs.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US appsd -> apps,
apps d, apposed
mx5000tools-libs.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US bluetooth ->
Bluetooth, blue tooth, blue-tooth
mx5000tools-libs.x86_64: W: invalid-url URL:
https://github.com/jwrdegoede/mx5000tools-revo <urlopen error [Errno -2] Name
or service not known>
/usr/share/rpmlint/Pkg.py:168: UnicodeWarning: decode() called on unicode
string, see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1693751
  s.decode('UTF-8')
6 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 12 warnings.



Requires
--------
mx5000tools-debuginfo (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):

mx5000tools-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    libmx5000.so.0()(64bit)
    mx5000tools-libs(x86-64)

mx5000tools (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    libc.so.6()(64bit)
    libmx5000.so.0()(64bit)
    mx5000tools-libs(x86-64)
    rtld(GNU_HASH)

mx5000tools-libs (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    libc.so.6()(64bit)
    libnetpbm.so.11()(64bit)
    rtld(GNU_HASH)

mx5000tools-debugsource (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):



Provides
--------
mx5000tools-debuginfo:
    debuginfo(build-id)
    mx5000tools-debuginfo
    mx5000tools-debuginfo(x86-64)

mx5000tools-devel:
    mx5000tools-devel
    mx5000tools-devel(x86-64)

mx5000tools:
    mx5000tools
    mx5000tools(x86-64)

mx5000tools-libs:
    libmx5000.so.0()(64bit)
    mx5000tools-libs
    mx5000tools-libs(x86-64)

mx5000tools-debugsource:
    mx5000tools-debugsource
    mx5000tools-debugsource(x86-64)



Source checksums
----------------
https://github.com/jwrdegoede/mx5000tools-revo/archive/496788107a915f94c2e17a86d937f0ac10e6cf80/mx5000tools-4967881.tar.gz
:
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package     :
5d6a556fade031c6d6d6b6bca21528ad087c27e1171f3e81a19bf7388fc6b70f
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package :
5d6a556fade031c6d6d6b6bca21528ad087c27e1171f3e81a19bf7388fc6b70f


AutoTools: Obsoleted m4s found
------------------------------
  AC_PROG_LIBTOOL found in: mx5000tools-revo-
  496788107a915f94c2e17a86d937f0ac10e6cf80/mx5000tools/configure.ac:10


Generated by fedora-review 0.7.2 (65d36bb) last change: 2019-04-09
Command line :./try-fedora-review -m fedora-rawhide-x86_64 -b 1701242
Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64
Active plugins: Generic, Shell-api, C/C++
Disabled plugins: Java, Python, fonts, SugarActivity, Ocaml, Perl, Haskell, R,
PHP, Ruby
Disabled flags: EXARCH, DISTTAG, BATCH, EPEL7, EPEL6

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux