https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1691022 --- Comment #16 from Numan Siddique <numan.siddique@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #12) > - Add BR for gcc > > - Update License field > > > BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised" License > --------------------------------------- > openvswitch-2.11.0/include/sparse/rte_byteorder.h > openvswitch-2.11.0/include/sparse/rte_esp.h > openvswitch-2.11.0/include/sparse/rte_flow.h > openvswitch-2.11.0/include/windows/netinet/icmp6.h > openvswitch-2.11.0/include/windows/netinet/ip6.h > openvswitch-2.11.0/lib/strsep.c > openvswitch-2.11.0/tests/dpdk/ring_client.c > > BSD 4-clause "Original" or "Old" License > ---------------------------------------- > openvswitch-2.11.0/include/sparse/rte_icmp.h > openvswitch-2.11.0/include/sparse/rte_ip.h > openvswitch-2.11.0/include/sparse/rte_sctp.h > openvswitch-2.11.0/include/sparse/rte_tcp.h > openvswitch-2.11.0/include/sparse/rte_udp.h > > Expat License > ------------- > openvswitch-2.11.0/build-aux/install-sh > openvswitch-2.11.0/include/openflow/openflow-1.3.h > openvswitch-2.11.0/include/openflow/openflow-1.4.h > openvswitch-2.11.0/include/openflow/openflow-1.5.h > > GPL (v2) > -------- > openvswitch-2.11.0/datapath/actions.c > openvswitch-2.11.0/datapath/compat.h > openvswitch-2.11.0/datapath/conntrack.c > openvswitch-2.11.0/datapath/conntrack.h > openvswitch-2.11.0/datapath/datapath.c > openvswitch-2.11.0/datapath/datapath.h > openvswitch-2.11.0/datapath/dp_notify.c > openvswitch-2.11.0/datapath/flow.c > openvswitch-2.11.0/datapath/flow.h > openvswitch-2.11.0/datapath/flow_netlink.c > openvswitch-2.11.0/datapath/flow_netlink.h > openvswitch-2.11.0/datapath/flow_table.c > openvswitch-2.11.0/datapath/flow_table.h > openvswitch-2.11.0/datapath/linux/compat/geneve.c > openvswitch-2.11.0/datapath/linux/compat/gre.c > openvswitch-2.11.0/datapath/linux/compat/gso.c > openvswitch-2.11.0/datapath/linux/compat/include/net/mpls.h > openvswitch-2.11.0/datapath/linux/compat/ip_tunnel.c > openvswitch-2.11.0/datapath/linux/compat/ip_tunnels_core.c > openvswitch-2.11.0/datapath/linux/compat/lisp.c > openvswitch-2.11.0/datapath/linux/compat/vxlan.c > openvswitch-2.11.0/datapath/meter.c > openvswitch-2.11.0/datapath/meter.h > openvswitch-2.11.0/datapath/nsh.c > openvswitch-2.11.0/datapath/vport-gre.c > openvswitch-2.11.0/datapath/vport-internal_dev.c > openvswitch-2.11.0/datapath/vport-internal_dev.h > openvswitch-2.11.0/datapath/vport-netdev.c > openvswitch-2.11.0/datapath/vport-netdev.h > openvswitch-2.11.0/datapath/vport-vxlan.c > openvswitch-2.11.0/datapath/vport.c > openvswitch-2.11.0/datapath/vport.h > openvswitch-2.11.0/xenserver/usr_lib_xsconsole_plugins-base_XSFeatureVSwitch. > py > > Update license breakdown comment as well. > > - Own these directories: > > [!]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. > Note: No known owner of /usr/share/openvswitch, > /usr/lib/ocf/resource.d/ovn, /usr/share/openvswitch/scripts The directores - /usr/share/openvswitch and /usr/share/openvswitch/scripts are created by openvwitch package. I think the openvswitch.spec file should be modified to own these directories right ? Thanks Numan > > - Issue with Provides/Obsoletes > > ovn.x86_64: W: self-obsoletion openvswitch-ovn-common < 2.11.0-3 obsoletes > openvswitch-ovn-common = 2.11.0-2.fc31 > > The version you provide should be > to the version you obsolete, so at least > 2.11.0-4 > > - Use Fedora crypto default: > > ovn.x86_64: W: crypto-policy-non-compliance-openssl /usr/bin/ovn-nbctl > SSL_CTX_set_cipher_list > ovn.x86_64: W: crypto-policy-non-compliance-openssl /usr/bin/ovn-sbctl > SSL_CTX_set_cipher_list > ovn.x86_64: W: crypto-policy-non-compliance-openssl /usr/bin/ovn-trace > SSL_CTX_set_cipher_list > > See https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/CryptoPolicies/ > > That is: patch lib/stream-ssl.c:1017 to use "PROFILE=SYSTEM" > > - > > # Using {_lib} macro will solve the > # rpmlink error, but will install the files in /usr/lib64/. > # OVN pacemaker ocf script file is copied in /usr/lib/ocf/resource.d/ovn/ > # and we are not sure if pacemaker looks into this path to find the > # OVN resource agent script. > > Can't you check if lib64 actually work or not? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx