[Bug 1689634] Review Request: mako - Lightweight Wayland notification daemon

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1689634



--- Comment #11 from Jan Staněk <jstanek@xxxxxxxxxx> ---
(In reply to Timothée Floure from comment #10)
> I wasn't aware of those macros (and did not find them rpm.org!) and could
> not find a way to work with non-archived sources with %setup or %autosetup.

Yeah, the RPM documentation is sparse and kind of all over the place…

In other news:
- The `%{?systemd_requires}` fixed directory ownership for the systemd unit
(mako.service), but unfortunately not for dbus unit (fr.emersion.Mako.service).
Looking at dunst, it may be fixed by adding `Requires: dbus`. In order for the
service to actually pick up the notifications, the dbus is required, so I think
it makes sense to add it.
- Also from reading dunst spec file, it `Provides:
desktop-notification-daemon`. I was not able to find anything specific to that
provide, but according to `dnf provides desktop-notification-daemon` all the
other notification daemons do provide it – so I guess mako should as well.

All other issues seems to have been fixed, so hopefully this is the last
iteration ;)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux