[Bug 1693987] Review Request: java-latest-openjdk - rolling release for short term support OpenJDK

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1693987



--- Comment #17 from Petra Alice Mikova <pmikova@xxxxxxxxxx> ---
(In reply to Severin Gehwolf from comment #15)
> (In reply to jiri vanek from comment #14)
> > One expect digit in the middle.
> 
> I'm curious: What expects it? A human? Some tooling?

Some of our tools expect it (at least jsf definitely does), but I would not say
that is a dealbreaker, I can fix that one. 

I am no expert in this area, so I don't know how many things could it break,
but I like the "latest" idea, it would be less confusing imho, for users, than
having 2x java-xy-openjdk when lts comes, since I would expect, if I hadn't
know this, to have same dir as package name. The rolling suffix is much easier
to miss, than different dir name. The version is mentioned there in both cases,
so I don't mind.

I can change this easily, so just tell me if I should change it.


Thanks!

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux