https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1693987 --- Comment #16 from jiri vanek <jvanek@xxxxxxxxxx> --- both? total 12 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 26 Jan 19 12:58 java -> /etc/alternatives/java_sdk lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 29 Jan 19 12:58 java-11 -> /etc/alternatives/java_sdk_11 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 37 Jan 19 12:58 java-11-openjdk -> /etc/alternatives/java_sdk_11_openjdk drwxr-xr-x 7 root root 4096 Jan 19 12:57 java-11-openjdk-11.0.1.13-10.fc29.x86_64 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 32 Jan 19 12:58 java-1.8.0 -> /etc/alternatives/java_sdk_1.8.0 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 40 Jan 19 12:58 java-1.8.0-openjdk -> /etc/alternatives/java_sdk_1.8.0_openjdk drwxr-xr-x 7 root root 4096 Jan 19 12:57 java-1.8.0-openjdk-1.8.0.191.b13-0.fc29.x86_64 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 28 May 29 2018 java-9 -> /etc/alternatives/java_sdk_9 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 36 May 29 2018 java-9-openjdk -> /etc/alternatives/java_sdk_9_openjdk drwxr-xr-x 7 root root 4096 May 29 2018 java-9-openjdk-9.0.4.11-6.fc28.x86_64 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 34 Jan 19 12:58 java-openjdk -> /etc/alternatives/java_sdk_openjdk lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 21 Jan 19 12:59 jre -> /etc/alternatives/jre lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 24 Jan 19 12:58 jre-11 -> /etc/alternatives/jre_11 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 32 Jan 19 12:58 jre-11-openjdk -> /etc/alternatives/jre_11_openjdk lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 40 Dec 21 20:40 jre-11-openjdk-11.0.1.13-10.fc29.x86_64 -> java-11-openjdk-11.0.1.13-10.fc29.x86_64 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 27 Jan 19 12:59 jre-1.8.0 -> /etc/alternatives/jre_1.8.0 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 35 Jan 19 12:59 jre-1.8.0-openjdk -> /etc/alternatives/jre_1.8.0_openjdk lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 50 Jan 14 16:42 jre-1.8.0-openjdk-1.8.0.191.b13-0.fc29.x86_64 -> java-1.8.0-openjdk-1.8.0.191.b13-0.fc29.x86_64/jre lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 23 May 29 2018 jre-9 -> /etc/alternatives/jre_9 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 31 May 29 2018 jre-9-openjdk -> /etc/alternatives/jre_9_openjdk lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 37 Feb 14 2018 jre-9-openjdk-9.0.4.11-6.fc28.x86_64 -> java-9-openjdk-9.0.4.11-6.fc28.x86_64 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 29 Jan 19 12:59 jre-openjdk -> /etc/alternatives/jre_openjdk jvanek jvanek 09:52:35 ~ $ alternatives --config java There are 3 programs which provide 'java'. Selection Command ----------------------------------------------- 1 java-11-openjdk.x86_64 (/usr/lib/jvm/java-11-openjdk-11.0.1.13-10.fc29.x86_64/bin/java) 2 java-9-openjdk.x86_64 (/usr/lib/jvm/java-9-openjdk-9.0.4.11-6.fc28.x86_64/bin/java) *+ 3 java-1.8.0-openjdk.x86_64 (/usr/lib/jvm/java-1.8.0-openjdk-1.8.0.191.b13-0.fc29.x86_64/jre/bin/java) Enter to keep the current selection[+], or type selection number: ^C jvanek jvanek 09:52:53 ~ $ alternatives --config javac There are 3 programs which provide 'javac'. Selection Command ----------------------------------------------- 1 java-9-openjdk.x86_64 (/usr/lib/jvm/java-9-openjdk-9.0.4.11-6.fc28.x86_64/bin/javac) *+ 2 java-1.8.0-openjdk.x86_64 (/usr/lib/jvm/java-1.8.0-openjdk-1.8.0.191.b13-0.fc29.x86_64/bin/javac) 3 java-11-openjdk.x86_64 (/usr/lib/jvm/java-11-openjdk-11.0.1.13-10.fc29.x86_64/bin/javac) On contrary, I already made one very bad decision in this topic -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx