https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1671064 --- Comment #12 from Gergely Gombos <gombosg@xxxxxxxxx> --- Thanks Dominik, I was just doing that. :) * Fri Feb 15 2019 Gergely Gombos <gombosg@xxxxxxxxx> - 2.0.2.2-4 - Add s390x ExcludeArch See #1677491. I don't have an s390x machine nor an actual LDAC headset to patch & test upstream code so I'm excluding this arch. :) Builds fine now: Rawhide https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=32832242 F29 https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=32832365 This still fails for ppc64, with the same byte order error: F28 https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=32832369 (https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/2399/32832399/build.log) Does anyone know if there is a difference between F28 ppc64 and F29 ppc64 byte order support? I either have to exclude ppc64 or not release for F28, right? Which one is the better choice in this case? (I'd rather not release for F28 since ppc64 works on F29+ and F28 would be EOL'd anyway soon.) Thanks for the help. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
