https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1671571 Neal Gompa <ngompa13@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ngompa13@xxxxxxxxx --- Comment #10 from Neal Gompa <ngompa13@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Justin W. Flory from comment #9) > (In reply to Fabio Valentini from comment #7) > > It's not. You just forgot to remove the corresponding entry from the %files > > section - and now it can't find the file that you removed - that's all. > > (In reply to Dridi Boukelmoune from comment #8) > > Fabio, I know that our guidelines strongly advise against static linking > > (and bundling in general) but I find it sad to prevent end-users to > > statically build software on top of Fedora if that's what they want and > > upstream provides the means. But if that's our guidelines, I can live > > without the static library and I personally don't care since I integrate > > %{_bindir}/playerctl in my local setup. > > I took the middle-ground approach and built a separate, optional package > with the static libraries. The updated commit [1] passed successfully Koji > [2][3] and COPR [4]. An updated SRPM is also available [5]. > This is obviously allowed, but in Fedora, we just use "-static" instead of "-devel-static". The latter is openSUSE's (and long-ago Fedora) naming for static libraries... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
