[Bug 1658199] Review Request: netatalk - Open Source Apple Filing Protocol(AFP) File Server

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1658199



--- Comment #27 from Scott Talbert <swt@xxxxxxxxxx> ---
(In reply to Andrew Bauer from comment #26)
> From my el7 server:
> 
> > $ type ldconfig
> > ldconfig is /usr/sbin/ldconfig
> 
> Performing a yum whatprovides /usr/sbin/ldconfig, shows the binary is part
> of the glibc package:

Ah, right.  EL7 still uses yum, I do see the provide for /usr/sbin/ldconfig
with yum on EL7.  However it doesn't show up for dnf on EL7.

> For el7, the path to ldconfig is correct. 
> 
> For fedora, what we care is about is ensuring that the %ldconfig macro is
> not defined at all, which is the case with the last change I made.
> 
> The netatalk package currently installs on two machines I have running, one
> f28 the other f29.
> It installs on my machines because I do in fact have /usr/sbin/ldconfig
> present on the filesystem, on both of these machines. It is a mystery why it
> is present, but that is the reason why I can install the package and you
> cannot.

Well, I looked on my systems - it turns out that /usr/sbin/ldconfig is there as
well.  It appears that it's a hard link between /sbin/ldconfig.  The presence
or absence of /usr/sbin/ldconfig isn't what's causing the installation failure,
though.  It's dnf not seeing a Provide for /usr/sbin/ldconfig.  Are you perhaps
installing directly with rpm or something?

> Unless we can find some documentation stating definitively whether or not
> rhel 8 will require calling ldconfig, I'd rather just leave the macro as it
> is set currently.

Well, rhel 8 will certainly be using dnf so I think you should probably use the
/sbin/ldconfig path that it will find.  That's what the packaging guidelines
use, anyway.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux