https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1671571 --- Comment #8 from Dridi Boukelmoune <dridi.boukelmoune@xxxxxxxxx> --- Justin, a static library is not code you run, but code you (statically) link to as part of a build process, that's why I moved it to the -devel sub-package. It could have also lived in a -static sub-packages too, you can find such occurrences in the repositories. Fabio, I know that our guidelines strongly advise against static linking (and bundling in general) but I find it sad to prevent end-users to statically build software on top of Fedora if that's what they want and upstream provides the means. But if that's our guidelines, I can live without the static library and I personally don't care since I integrate %{_bindir}/playerctl in my local setup. Thanks for your help with the review, I'll wait for an update until the sponsorship is solved to formally review the package. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
