https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1672313 Bug ID: 1672313 Summary: Review Request: perl-Perl-PrereqScanner-NotQuiteLite - A tool to scan your Perl code for its prerequisites Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Reporter: paul@xxxxxxxxxxxx QA Contact: extras-qa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx CC: package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://subversion.city-fan.org/repos/cfo-repo/perl-Perl-PrereqScanner-NotQuiteLite/branches/fedora/perl-Perl-PrereqScanner-NotQuiteLite.spec SRPM URL: http://www.city-fan.org/~paul/extras/perl-Perl-PrereqScanner-NotQuiteLite/perl-Perl-PrereqScanner-NotQuiteLite-0.9903-1.fc30.src.rpm Description: Perl::PrereqScanner::NotQuiteLite is yet another prerequisites scanner. It passes almost all the scanning tests for Perl::PrereqScanner and Module::ExtractUse (i.e. except for a few dubious ones), and runs slightly faster than PPI-based Perl::PrereqScanner. However, it doesn't run as fast as Perl::PrereqScanner::Lite (which uses an XS lexer). Perl::PrereqScanner::NotQuiteLite also recognizes eval. Prerequisites in eval are not considered as requirements, but you can collect them as suggestions. Conditional requirements or requirements loaded in a block are treated as recommends. No-ed modules are stored separately (since 0.94). You may or may not need to merge them into requires. Fedora Account System Username: pghmcfc -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
