https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1648728 Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) <sanjay.ankur@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |needinfo?(pviktori@redhat.c | |om) --- Comment #18 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) <sanjay.ankur@xxxxxxxxx> --- - Libtaskotron maintainer is happy to consider migration once progressbar2 is in Fedora (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1654746#c1) - python-bitmath upstream is also happy to migrate (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1654747#c1) Petr, is this enough to make progressbar2 the default implementation, or should I import it as a different package based on this review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx