[Bug 1648728] Review Request: python-progressbar2 - A Progressbar library to provide visual progress to long running operations

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1648728

Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) <sanjay.ankur@xxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Flags|                            |needinfo?(pviktori@redhat.c
                   |                            |om)



--- Comment #18 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) <sanjay.ankur@xxxxxxxxx> ---
- Libtaskotron maintainer is happy to consider migration once progressbar2 is
in Fedora (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1654746#c1)

- python-bitmath upstream is also happy to migrate
(https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1654747#c1)

Petr, is this enough to make progressbar2 the default implementation, or should
I import it as a different package based on this review?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux