https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1653010 --- Comment #5 from Carmen Bianca Bakker <carmenbianca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #4) > LGTM, package approved. Thanks! > > (In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #2) > > > - CC-BY-SA-4.0 The shorthand should be CC-BY-SA > > > > <https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main> says that CC-BY-SA is > > shorthand for CC-BY-SA-3.0. I'd like it doubly confirmed if CC-BY-SA can be > > shorthand for _both_, though that would be rather not-very-ideal. > > From Tom answer to your mail: > > The 4.0 version of the Creative Commons licenses are as good as the 3.0 > versions. I have updated the links to the CC licenses to point to the > 4.0 revision, no change in License tag in package spec files is required. Should I update the licence to point to `CC-BY-SA` instead of `CC-BY-SA-4.0` now? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
