https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1653010 Robert-André Mauchin <zebob.m@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |zebob.m@xxxxxxxxx Flags| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Robert-André Mauchin <zebob.m@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Carmen Bianca Bakker from comment #3) > Hi Robert-André, > > Thanks for your quick and detailed review. I have updated the spec and srpm > at the links to include your suggestions except: > LGTM, package approved. > (In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #2) > > - CC-BY-SA-4.0 The shorthand should be CC-BY-SA > > <https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main> says that CC-BY-SA is > shorthand for CC-BY-SA-3.0. I'd like it doubly confirmed if CC-BY-SA can be > shorthand for _both_, though that would be rather not-very-ideal. >From Tom answer to your mail: The 4.0 version of the Creative Commons licenses are as good as the 3.0 versions. I have updated the links to the CC licenses to point to the 4.0 revision, no change in License tag in package spec files is required. ~tom You still need to find a sponsor. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
