https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1649574 --- Comment #6 from Severin Gehwolf <sgehwolf@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Jie Kang from comment #5) > The notice file [1] has: > > SPDX-License-Identifier: EPL-2.0 OR BSD-3-Clause OR GPL-2.0 WITH > Classpath-exception-2.0 > > I believe the spec should follow this. > > [1] https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/jaf/blob/master/NOTICE.md We should use license identifiers as listed in this list: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main?rd=Licensing#Good_Licenses Fedora doesn't use SPDX-License-Identifiers. See: https://lists.pagure.io/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/thread/UEAZMPBRABEL34N2PULWOYSFLBRAPQVR/ Thus, the above would IMO translate to: EPL-2.0 OR BSD OR GPLv2 with exceptions Having said that, I'm not sure how to handle software which is available under more than one license. Best to ask fedora-legal what should be used. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
