Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: roxterm - A fast terminal emulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=290011 ------- Additional Comments From panemade@xxxxxxxxx 2007-09-19 00:20 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > desktop file does not have vendor tag so following guideline is valid here. > > *if upstream uses <vendor_id>, leave it intact, otherwise use fedora as > <vendor_id>. > > To not misunderstand you: I do not have to change something here and my spec is > correct in this case? I think this is confusion around some peoples that if upstream is not having desktop file in tarball and if we are giving it then only use fedora tag but current guidelines said opposite to this. So I only commented that I am considering current guidelines. > > > Use gtk-update-icon-cache scriptlet > > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#head-7103f6c38d1b5735e8477bdd569ad73ea2c49bda > > Spec URL: http://deadbabylon.de/fedora/extras/roxterm.spec > SRPM URL: http://deadbabylon.de/fedora/extras/roxterm-1.7.4-2.fc8.src.rpm thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review