Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jcip-annotations - Java 5 thread safety annotations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=262401 ------- Additional Comments From loganjerry@xxxxxxxxx 2007-09-19 00:17 EST ------- Thanks for the comments. I changed the name and version number as suggested. For the javadocs, I just unconditionally build them (because not every arch will have IcedTea, so the check with %{fedora} is insufficient). The package description for the javadocs notes that on systems with sinjdoc, the package contains nothing useful. As for the Group tag, I don't understand the problem. On my machine, there are 64 packages in that group (e.g., axis, bcel, castor, jrefactory), and I certainly have not installed all of the Java packages available from Fedora. Why should the final '/Java' be dropped? The new files are here: Spec URL: http://jjames.fedorapeople.org/jcip-annotations/jcip-annotations.spec SRPM URL: http://jjames.fedorapeople.org/jcip-annotations/jcip-annotations-0-20060626.1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review