[Bug 1636668] Review Request: wxHexEditor - A graphical Hex Editor

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1636668

Luis Segundo <luis@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |luis@xxxxxxxxxxxxx



--- Comment #7 from Luis Segundo <luis@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> ---
Please check this issues

Issues:
=======
- Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
  Note: wxHexEditor-debugsource :
  /usr/src/debug/wxHexEditor-0.24-1.fc28.x86_64/src/FAL.h wxHexEditor-
  debugsource :
  /usr/src/debug/wxHexEditor-0.24-1.fc28.x86_64/src/HexDialogs.h
  wxHexEditor-debugsource :
  /usr/src/debug/wxHexEditor-0.24-1.fc28.x86_64/src/HexEditor.h
  wxHexEditor-debugsource :
  /usr/src/debug/wxHexEditor-0.24-1.fc28.x86_64/src/HexEditorApp.h
  wxHexEditor-debugsource :
 
/usr/src/debug/wxHexEditor-0.24-1.fc28.x86_64/src/HexEditorCtrl/HexEditorCtrl.h
  wxHexEditor-debugsource :
 
/usr/src/debug/wxHexEditor-0.24-1.fc28.x86_64/src/HexEditorCtrl/HexEditorCtrlGui.h
  wxHexEditor-debugsource :
 
/usr/src/debug/wxHexEditor-0.24-1.fc28.x86_64/src/HexEditorCtrl/wxHexCtrl/Tag.h
  wxHexEditor-debugsource :
 
/usr/src/debug/wxHexEditor-0.24-1.fc28.x86_64/src/HexEditorCtrl/wxHexCtrl/TagDialogGui.h
  wxHexEditor-debugsource :
 
/usr/src/debug/wxHexEditor-0.24-1.fc28.x86_64/src/HexEditorCtrl/wxHexCtrl/wxHexCtrl.h
  wxHexEditor-debugsource :
  /usr/src/debug/wxHexEditor-0.24-1.fc28.x86_64/src/HexEditorFrame.h
  wxHexEditor-debugsource :
  /usr/src/debug/wxHexEditor-0.24-1.fc28.x86_64/src/HexEditorGui.h
  wxHexEditor-debugsource :
  /usr/src/debug/wxHexEditor-0.24-1.fc28.x86_64/src/HexPanels.h
  See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#DevelPackages

- All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
  are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
  Note: These BR are not needed: gcc-c++
  See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Exceptions_2

- [!]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.
     Note: Spec file as given by url is not the same as in SRPM (see
     attached diff).

   none document file?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux