Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: e16 - The Enlightenment window manager, DR16 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254056 ------- Additional Comments From terjeros@xxxxxxxxxxxx 2007-09-17 12:48 EST ------- > 1. Some of the source files appear to be GPLv2+ GPLv2+ added to license. > In addition there is a copy of the Bitsteam Vera Fonts with their own license > inside the "winter.etheme" tar.gz thats in the e16 tar.gz. Can that be made > somehow to use the already existing Vera package? Removed ttfonts dir, created a symlink and added bitstream-vera to req, seems to work. > I will have spot check it over... Ok, thanks. > 2. Some possible missing BuildRequires: Tried to add some X related devel packages, better now? > 3. rpmlint says: > > e16.i386: E: zero-length /usr/share/e16/themes/winter/slideouts/slideouts.cfg > e16.i386: E: zero-length /usr/share/e16/themes/winter/buttons/buttons.cfg > > Not sure if those can be removed, or if they are needed by that theme... Tried that, not a crash, but a freeze, better leave these. > e16.i386: E: invalid-soname /usr/lib/libe16_hack.so libe16_hack.so > > Does that so file need to be in /usr/lib? Don't know, however e16 seems to be happy without this lib, maybe needed by the epplets? > e16.i386: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/e16-0.16.8.9/ChangeLog > e16.i386: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/e16-0.16.8.9/AUTHORS > > Might run 'iconv' on those? Fixed. SPEC: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/e16/e16.spec SRPM: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/e16/e16-0.16.8.9-2.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review