[Bug 254056] Review Request: e16 - The Enlightenment window manager, DR16

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: e16 -  The Enlightenment window manager, DR16


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254056





------- Additional Comments From kevin@xxxxxxxxx  2007-09-13 00:55 EST -------
OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines
OK - Spec file matches base package name.
OK - Spec has consistant macro usage.
OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines.
See below - License
See below - License field in spec matches
OK - License file included in package
OK - Spec in American English
OK - Spec is legible.
OK - Sources match upstream md5sum:
8d27553ae9c582a9d331ea4077063a14  e16-0.16.8.9.tar.gz
8d27553ae9c582a9d331ea4077063a14  e16-0.16.8.9.tar.gz.1
See below - BuildRequires correct
OK - Spec handles locales/find_lang
OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good.
OK - Package has a correct %clean section.
OK - Package has correct buildroot
OK - Package is code or permissible content.
OK - Doc subpackage needed/used.
OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime.
OK - Package has rm -rf RPM_BUILD_ROOT at top of %install

OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch.
OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files.
OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own.
OK - Package owns all the directories it creates.
See below - No rpmlint output.
OK - final provides and requires are sane.

SHOULD Items:

OK - Should build in mock.
OK - Should build on all supported archs
OK - Should have dist tag
OK - Should package latest version

Issues:

1. Some of the source files appear to be GPLv2+
epp/cpperror.c
epp/cppalloc.c
epp/cppexp.c
epp/cpphash.c
epp/cpplib.c
epp/cpplib.h
epp/cppmain.c

>From a quick look, those source files all compile to the epp binary.

The rest are BSDish, but not matching exactly any of the examples on the wiki.
I am a bit concerned with the second paragraph:

"  The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in
  all copies of the Software, its documentation and marketing & publicity
  materials, and acknowledgment shall be given in the documentation, materials
  and software packages that this Software was used."

In addition there is a copy of the Bitsteam Vera Fonts with their own license
inside the "winter.etheme" tar.gz thats in the e16 tar.gz. Can that be made
somehow to use the already existing Vera package?

I will have spot check it over...

2. Some possible missing BuildRequires:

checking X11/SM/SMlib.h usability... no
checking X11/SM/SMlib.h presence... no
checking for X11/SM/SMlib.h... no
checking for SmcOpenConnection in -lSM... no
checking for XFT... no
checking for XineramaQueryExtension in -lXinerama... no
configure: WARNING: Xinerama support was requested but not found
checking for XF86VidModeQueryExtension in -lXxf86vm... no
configure: WARNING: Zoom support was requested but not found
checking for XRRQueryExtension in -lXrandr... no
configure: WARNING: RandR support was requested but not found
checking for X11/extensions/Xrandr.h... no
checking for XCompositeQueryExtension in -lXcomposite... no
checking for X11/extensions/Xcomposite.h... no
checking for X11/extensions/Xdamage.h... no
checking for X11/extensions/Xfixes.h... no
checking for X11/extensions/Xrender.h... no
configure: WARNING: Composite support was requested but required component was
not found
checking for mass_quantities_of_bass_ale in -lFridge... no
checking for mass_quantities_of_any_ale in -lFridge... no
Warning: No ales were found in your refrigerator.
  We highly suggest that you rectify this situation immediately.

3. rpmlint says:

e16.i386: E: zero-length /usr/share/e16/themes/winter/slideouts/slideouts.cfg
e16.i386: E: zero-length /usr/share/e16/themes/winter/buttons/buttons.cfg

Not sure if those can be removed, or if they are needed by that theme...

e16.i386: E: invalid-soname /usr/lib/libe16_hack.so libe16_hack.so

Does that so file need to be in /usr/lib?

e16.i386: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/e16-0.16.8.9/ChangeLog
e16.i386: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/e16-0.16.8.9/AUTHORS

Might run 'iconv' on those?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]