Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive-texmf - Architecture independent parts of the TeX formatting system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=229180 ------- Additional Comments From rf10@xxxxxxxxx 2007-09-15 17:21 EST ------- (In reply to comment #42) > Also it seems to me that at least updmap should be run as a > texmf package scriptlet, and not as the main package scriptlet, > since all that updmap needs is in the texmf packages, including > the config file. why bother? where should one draw the line between applications (like tex) and tools like (texhash)? where should kpsewhich live -- obviously a tool, but implemented as a compiled program? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review