Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242416 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus@xxxxxxx 2007-09-15 15:13 EST ------- After a quick look, it looks like ptex can only be build within a full web2c build. This could be a reason for reintroducing the dependency on the texmf package. Another possibility could be to install only the needed files in a place where they would be searched for during the build. Another possibility could be to drop the ptex support since it should really be integrated upstream and not in fedora. The debian solution is to add a package with stripped down tetex sources. This is also possible, but a fair amount of work. Another possibility would be to package ptex separately, with the main texlive source, and only build ptex in this srpm. This seems to me to be the cleanest way, in fact. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review