https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1628752 Robert-André Mauchin <zebob.m@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |zebob.m@xxxxxxxxx Assignee|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |zebob.m@xxxxxxxxx Flags| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin <zebob.m@xxxxxxxxx> --- - Group: is not used in Fedora - Use a more meaningful name for your archive with: Source: https://github.com/intel/ipmctl/archive/v%{version}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz - If you obsolete stuff, you should add similar Provides in order to have an upgrade path for your users: Obsoletes: ixpdimm-cli < 01.00.00.3000 Obsoletes: ixpdimm_sw < 01.00.00.3000 Obsoletes: libixpdimm-common < 01.00.00.3000 Obsoletes: libixpdimm-core < 01.00.00.3000 Obsoletes: libixpdimm-cli < 01.00.00.3000 Obsoletes: libixpdimm-cim < 01.00.00.3000 Obsoletes: libixpdimm < 01.00.00.3000 Obsoletes: ixpdimm-data < 01.00.00.3000 → obsolete-not-provided: If a package is obsoleted by a compatible replacement, the obsoleted package should also be provided in order to not cause unnecessary dependency breakage. If the obsoleting package is not a compatible replacement for the old one, leave out the Provides. - Are you sure you need to specify the lib dependency in ipmctl and ipmctl-monitor? Usually RPM is able to pick up what libs are necessary automatically. Requires: libipmctl%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} I've checked and libipmctl.so.2()(64bit) is indeed picked up, so you don't need these Requires. - Build fails: [ 1%] Generating String Definitions python /builddir/build/BUILD/ipmctl-01.00.00.3262/src/os/efi_shim/os_efi_hii_auto_gen_strings.py BUILDSTDERR: make[2]: python: Command not found BUILDSTDERR: make[2]: *** [CMakeFiles/stringdefs.dir/build.make:70: src/os/efi_shim/os_efi_hii_auto_gen_strings.h] Error 127 make[2]: Leaving directory '/builddir/build/BUILD/ipmctl-01.00.00.3262' BUILDSTDERR: make[1]: *** [CMakeFiles/Makefile2:303: CMakeFiles/stringdefs.dir/all] Error 2 It should call python2 or python3 not "python". Python 3 preferred as we're retiring Python 2 by 2020. - make -f Makefile install DESTDIR=%{buildroot} → %make_install -f Makefile - In order to avoid unintentional SONAME bump, globbing the major soname vension is now forbidden, instead use: %{_libdir}/libipmctl.so.2* - You should probably use %config(noreplace) here: %config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/ipmctl.conf - Split the description to stay below 80 characters per line: ipmctl-monitor.x86_64: E: description-line-too-long C A monitor daemon for monitoring the health and status of Utility for managing Intel Optane DC persistent memory modules - You need a logrotate file: libipmctl.x86_64: W: log-files-without-logrotate ['/var/log/ipmctl'] See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Logrotate_config_file - Release should start at 1 Release: 1%{?dist} - Your changelog entries are missing the Release info: %changelog * Thu Sep 13 2018 Juston Li <juston.li@xxxxxxxxx> - 01.00.00.3262-1 - Clean up spec for fedora * Wed May 02 2018 Juston Li <juston.li@xxxxxxxxx> - 01.00.00.3000-1 - initial spec Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed ===== MUST items ===== C/C++: [x]: Package does not contain kernel modules. [x]: Package contains no static executables. [x]: If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang. [x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [x]: ldconfig not called in %post and %postun for Fedora 28 and later. [x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) [x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs. [x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "Unknown or generated", "*No copyright* BSD (3 clause)", "MIT/X11 (BSD like)", "BSD (unspecified)", "BSD (3 clause)", "BSD (2 clause)". 5075 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/bob/packaging/review/ipmctl/review- ipmctl/licensecheck.txt [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [!]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: %config files are marked noreplace or the reason is justified. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: No %config files under /usr. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in ipmctl- monitor , libipmctl , ipmctl-debuginfo , ipmctl-debugsource [?]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [x]: Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [-]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files are correct. [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on debuginfo package(s). Note: No rpmlint messages. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is arched. [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Rpmlint ------- Checking: ipmctl-01.00.00.3262-2.fc30.x86_64.rpm ipmctl-monitor-01.00.00.3262-2.fc30.x86_64.rpm libipmctl-01.00.00.3262-2.fc30.x86_64.rpm libipmctl-devel-01.00.00.3262-2.fc30.x86_64.rpm ipmctl-debuginfo-01.00.00.3262-2.fc30.x86_64.rpm ipmctl-debugsource-01.00.00.3262-2.fc30.x86_64.rpm ipmctl-01.00.00.3262-2.fc30.src.rpm ipmctl.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 01.00.00.3262 ['01.00.00.3262-2.fc30', '01.00.00.3262-2'] ipmctl.x86_64: W: obsolete-not-provided ixpdimm-cli ipmctl.x86_64: W: no-documentation ipmctl.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary ipmctl ipmctl-monitor.x86_64: E: description-line-too-long C A monitor daemon for monitoring the health and status of Utility for managing Intel Optane DC persistent memory modules ipmctl-monitor.x86_64: W: obsolete-not-provided ixpdimm-monitor ipmctl-monitor.x86_64: W: manual-page-warning /usr/share/man/man1/ipmctl-change-device-passphrase.1.gz 134: warning: macro `..' not defined ipmctl-monitor.x86_64: W: manual-page-warning /usr/share/man/man1/ipmctl-change-preferences.1.gz 363: warning: macro `..' not defined ipmctl-monitor.x86_64: W: manual-page-warning /usr/share/man/man1/ipmctl-change-sensor.1.gz 133: warning: macro `..' not defined ipmctl-monitor.x86_64: W: manual-page-warning /usr/share/man/man1/ipmctl-delete-goal.1.gz 80: warning: macro `..' not defined ipmctl-monitor.x86_64: W: manual-page-warning /usr/share/man/man1/ipmctl-enable-device-security.1.gz 121: warning: macro `..' not defined ipmctl-monitor.x86_64: W: manual-page-warning /usr/share/man/man1/ipmctl-help.1.gz 64: warning: macro `..' not defined ipmctl-monitor.x86_64: W: manual-page-warning /usr/share/man/man1/ipmctl-inject.1.gz 248: warning: macro `..' not defined ipmctl-monitor.x86_64: W: manual-page-warning /usr/share/man/man1/ipmctl-update-firmware.1.gz 173: warning: macro `..' not defined ipmctl-monitor.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary ipmctl-monitor libipmctl.x86_64: E: description-line-too-long C An Application Programming Interface (API) library for managing Intel Optane DC persistent memory modules. libipmctl.x86_64: W: obsolete-not-provided ixpdimm-data libipmctl.x86_64: W: obsolete-not-provided ixpdimm_sw libipmctl.x86_64: W: obsolete-not-provided libixpdimm libipmctl.x86_64: W: obsolete-not-provided libixpdimm-cim libipmctl.x86_64: W: obsolete-not-provided libixpdimm-cli libipmctl.x86_64: W: obsolete-not-provided libixpdimm-common libipmctl.x86_64: W: obsolete-not-provided libixpdimm-core libipmctl.x86_64: W: log-files-without-logrotate ['/var/log/ipmctl'] libipmctl-devel.x86_64: W: obsolete-not-provided ixpdimm-devel libipmctl-devel.x86_64: W: obsolete-not-provided ixpdimm_sw-devel libipmctl-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation 7 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 25 warnings. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
