https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1503915 Miro Hrončok <mhroncok@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW Assignee|mhroncok@xxxxxxxxxx |nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx --- Comment #23 from Miro Hrončok <mhroncok@xxxxxxxxxx> --- My resistence is based on a fact that you are trying to workaround what I see as a no-problem and that you are diverging from upstream. No, there is no rule that you cannot remove one part of upstream software and replace it with something else because you think it's better. However I always though that this is something that is discouraged in Fedora and all our downstream changes must be highly justifiable, or on it's way to upstream. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Staying_close_to_upstream_projects If you are unwilling to accept this, I am unwilling to accept the package and am stepping down form the review. I guess there will be others who are not so prudent. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
