https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1503915 --- Comment #22 from Stuart D Gathman <stuart@xxxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Miro Hrončok from comment #21) Look, I really appreciate the nits you've pointed out, and I've learned a lot. But let me turn it around. Upstream provides two directly executable CLI python scripts in %{py_sitelib}. I symlink them to /usr/bin for convenience. Why are you so against that? All my packages have one or more symlinks for convenience, I've never encountered any resistance from reviewers over it before. My (admittedly snide, sorry) remark about the teleology of EASY scripts was based on my observation that they work on Windows, do not work for me out of the box on Fedora (I know you said installing some additional stuff would let them work), and when I trace through the source to debug, I find they end up doing the equivalent of simply symlinking the actual CLI scripts. Is there a Fedora rule against using symlinks to conveniently access python CLI scripts? Without the symlink, you could also just type "python3 -m roca.detect" as the equivalent of the /usr/bin/roca-detect symlink. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
