https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1582983 Eamon Walsh <ewalsh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?(ewalsh@termyseque | |nce.com) | --- Comment #10 from Eamon Walsh <ewalsh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- In response to comment #9: 1. My reasoning for having separate packages is that termy-qt is likely to need updates far more frequently than termy-server. If they are subpackages, every time the Qt application gets a bug fix or new feature, the server (which is intended to be installed in many more places such as containers and headless machines) will also get an update. Unless the Fedora infrastructure supports pushing updates for just one subpackage of a package? I double-checked the Packaging Guidelines and they seem to be silent on this issue. I can combine them into one package if this will help the review (could they be easily split back into separate packages later?) 2. I have added a comment about build type None and updated both spec files at the URL above. Thanks for reviewing this, if you want me to review a package or two in return just let me know. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/OA6T5DJF47EOQIASSLBVT7GNRSBREZXX/
