https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1577011 --- Comment #5 from Peter Oliver <mavit@xxxxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Vaughan from comment #4) > > - ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. > > Note: /sbin/ldconfig not called in wiringpi-libs > > See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Shared_Libraries > > On Fedora 27 and earlier, a post-install scriptlet is required in the libs > > subpackage. > DONE > https://github.com/agrez/wiringpi/commit/ > fadf83b45da31b5c2af25b693600ec90ef47c117 There's a macro, %ldconfig_scriptlets, that will do this for you. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Scriptlets#Shared_Libraries > > - Can this be built on all ARM flavours? ExclusiveArch could be set to > > %{arm} if so. > Do you want to know if it works on aarch64 too? I haven't actually tested > wiringpi on aarch64 (as you would need aarch64 BCM270x Linux kernel port, > which I haven't ever built), so I don't know if it works. Anyway, I updated > the spec and makefile patch to add aarch64 build support. Koji scratch > builds seem to build ok. > https://github.com/agrez/wiringpi/commit/ > db7bc872556ec98f5c82e443f48f51bed8c061da Searching the web suggests that there are/were some problems, here. I'll have a closer look when I can find a spare SD card to install onto. One more thought: I think wiringPi is principally a library that happens to include the gpio tool, rather than principally the gpio tool which happens to come with a library. Instead of putting the tool in wiringpi and the library in wiringpi-libs, does it make more sense to put the libraries in wiringpi, and the gpio tool in a package called, say, wiringpi-tools? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
