[Bug 1550595] Review Request: tpm2-abrmd-selinux - SELinux policies for tpm2-abrmd

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550595



--- Comment #15 from dac.override@xxxxxxxxx ---
it should be clarified because it is questionable.

If a "system_dbusd_domain" would need this permission then the permission would
have been enclosed with "system_dbusd_domain()"

Looking at 
https://github.com/tpm2-software/tpm2-abrmd/commit/51a3c55d772b
it seems that this file descriptor gets passed to dbusd

So at least now that part is explained.

ideally the dbusd.if header would have exported an
"dbus_rw_inherited_system_unix_stream_sockets()" interface for you to call, but
there is not so just change line:

https://github.com/tpm2-software/tpm2-abrmd/blob/1.x/selinux/tabrmd.te#L20

to look like:

allow system_dbusd_t tabrmd_t:unix_stream_socket { read write};

Optionally add a comment: # TODO: add to dbus.if:
dbus_rw_inherited_system_unix_stream_sockets() and call that instead

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux