Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gimp-resynthesizer - Gimp plugin for texture synthesis https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250210 nphilipp@xxxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(ewan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx | |k) ------- Additional Comments From nphilipp@xxxxxxxxxx 2007-09-03 05:45 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > OK; some signs of progress, but not quite a solution (yet): > - The name change is clearly your call, but is there any reason to single out > plugins as a special case of add on, or would you want to have a full set of > e.g: > gimp-plugin-XXXX > gimp-brush-XXXX > gimp-pattern-XXXX > I'm not sure there's a way to keep it consistent without having a > proliferation of special cases in the naming guidelines. I'd like to have that. As yours is the first package extending gimp in the repository, your sort of the guinea pig for it ;-). Shall we discuss this on fedora-devel-list? > - The build failure: it does indeed appear to be a 2.4 change, and while I > haven't 100% confirmed, it looks to be the same as this Debian bug > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=439469 so it looks like it > might be a problem in Gimp itself. I'm going to test the Debian patch and > if I then get a successful build of resynthesizer I'll file the appropriate > bug on the Gimp. Gimp should have a second RC shortly, we should try with that once it arrives. If it takes too long, I'll shove in a post RC1 SVN snapshot. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review