Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Ice - The Internet Communications Engine (Object middleware) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=234612 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2007-08-29 12:39 EST ------- (In reply to comment #55) On rereading the Ruby packaging guidelines, I also added Provides: Ruby(Ice) = > %{version} to the ruby package. (According to those guidelines, the package > "must" also apparently be called "ruby-ice", not "ice-ruby", but I don't really > want to do that.) Well, actually I don't know correctly what this part of Ruby packaging guidelines tries to say. IMO we can follow python module naming guideline: --------------------------------------------------------- Addon Packages (python modules) Packages of python modules (thus they rely on python as a parent) use a slightly different naming scheme. They should take into account the upstream name of the python module. This makes a package name format of python-$NAME. When in doubt, use the name of the module that you type to import it in a script. ---------------------------------------------------------- For this package, the parent package of ice-ruby is surely ice, so the name should be ice-ruby, not ruby-ice IMO. Also I am not sure whether ice-ruby should provide "ruby(Ice) = 1.8" (although it should be safe that ice-ruby provides it). Anyway please follow the procedure written on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review