Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249522 ------- Additional Comments From kaigai@xxxxxxxxxxxx 2007-08-29 01:49 EST ------- (In reply to comment #58) > I wonder if it'd be feasible to hide the sepostgres add-on data into > the t_hoff padding, the way OIDs have been handled the last few releases? > It's a bit of a long shot, but otherwise we're going to have a real hard > time with binary dependencies. In SE-PostgreSQL, all tuples have a its security attribute without any exception, and I made a decision it's not necessary this field with flexible length. It is the reason why I didn't use t_hoff padding to store security attribtue. Your suggestion seems to me fine enough. However, I hesitate to apply it onto the 8.2.x based SE-PostgreSQL now, because this change affects so wide range. I want this change to be queued for 8.3.x based SE-PostgreSQL. In the current version, I believe that installing se- version module into "/usr/lib/sepgsql" is the best way to enhance its functionality. Thanks, -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review