Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249522 ------- Additional Comments From tgl@xxxxxxxxxx 2007-08-29 00:49 EST ------- Hmm ... if you changed HeapTupleHeader then it is pretty much completely unsafe to load *any* standard extension module into sepostgres; we have no way to tell which ones depend on that data structure. But I think all the PLs do, and many contrib modules do, so none of those RPMs are compatible and you need to supply substitutes. I wonder if it'd be feasible to hide the sepostgres add-on data into the t_hoff padding, the way OIDs have been handled the last few releases? It's a bit of a long shot, but otherwise we're going to have a real hard time with binary dependencies. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review