https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1541566 --- Comment #6 from William Moreno <williamjmorenor@xxxxxxxxx> --- > > - Is it really necessary to split the python part into a separate library > > package? It doesn't seem to be used as a library, only as a binary. > > I did this after asking a few questions in the #fedora-devel irc. They > seemed to indicate that it was abnormal to not split python packages this > way to make future python 3 support easier to setup. Is that incorrect? > It is not common in Fedora packaging to split a python package in a %{name} package and a python2-%{name} subpackage, the only reason to do dat is if the python2-%{name} is a module importable and usefull without the executable files in %{name}, but this are few bites of direference for the user point of view. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
