https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1540073 --- Comment #4 from Petr Kubat <pkubat@xxxxxxxxxx> --- >I think we absolutely should keep the name for the binary RPM. After thinking about it a bit more I agree with keeping the name of the package as nss_nis. Changing it to libnss_nis would have some positives but there are also some other issues that would pop up. Since the package only has a single binary rpm it does not make sense to me to rename the srpm either. So lets keep it as it is. Will continue with the review. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
