https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1540073 --- Comment #3 from Florian Weimer <fweimer@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Matej Mužila from comment #2) > this package replaces the nss_nis package, previously a subpackage of glibc. > I think, it would be better to stay with the name "nss_nis". There are also > other nss modues, that use this name scheme (nss_<something>). > > I've already discussed the package name with Florian, he thinks that > "keeping nss_nis would be okay". I think we absolutely should keep the name for the binary RPM. I do not have a strong opinion regarding the source RPM, but lean to nss_nis as well. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
