[Bug 1481630] Review Request: virtualbox-guest-additions - VirtualBox Guest Additions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1481630



--- Comment #55 from Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> ---
(In reply to Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) from comment #54)
> There is nothing holding review maybe except that the 4.16-rc1 kernel lands
> (or maybe even before rc1). Does it have everything needed ?

4.16-rc1 has the vboxguest driver, but it is lacking the vboxsf driver which is
necessary for shared folder support. I've submitted this upstream and it has
been reviewed and I've posted a new version addressing all review comments. So
hopefully vboxsf will get accepted into next soonish and then I can add it as a
downstream patch to Fedora. That is plan A, plan B is to ship without shared
folder support. If we end up with plan B we should probably have the
akmod-VirtualBox package build vboxsf instead of it not building any guest
modules at all. 

> I plan to do some runtime tests once everything has landed in the coming
> weeks.
> 
> Once this guest addition package will be created, I think it will be updated
> along the rpmfusion VirtualBox-guest-addition package. As I expect, this
> last will be disabled for f28+, but continue to exist for older fedora,rhel.
> Based on this I think it's indeed correct to have the obsoletes/provide to
> use a version macro. So everything is fine (maybe only to have a comment to
> schedule the removal of obsoletes/provides for f28+2 or whatever rhel
> version is relevant).

Ok, we also need to modify akmod-VirtualBox to not build the guest drivers on
F-28+, as discussed before we will keep it around on existing guests which
upgrade to F28 to avoid playing obsolete tricks which will cause problems on
vbox-host installations.

> One item I wonder if it can be improved is the "vboxsf" user/group creation:
> (which I think is the correct way to have this user/group created). But:
> 
> Is this really needed ? Can this be avoided in the long run so vbox
> graphical users don't need to add themselves to this group manually ?

The vboxsf user/group is used by shared folders marked as automount, these get
mounted under /media and are only readable/writable by users in the vboxsf
group.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux