https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1531955 --- Comment #17 from Antonio Trande <anto.trande@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Alec Leamas from comment #16) > (In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #15) > > > > > All LICENSE files are already included: > > > > ## Renamed each single license file > > cp -p apps/rep_sep/LICENSE LGPLv3+.txt > > cp -p apps/rabema/LICENSE GPLv3+.txt > > cp -p LICENSE BSD.txt > > Not really. I see: > > $ cd BUILD > $ find . -name LICENSE\* | wc -l > 39 > > So, here is at least 39 license files. Looking at size, many are unique: > > ls -l $(find . -iname LICENSE\* ) | awk '{print $5}' | sort | uniq | wc -l > 30 > find . -name LICENSE | xargs licensecheck ./apps/pair_align/LICENSE: LGPL (v3 or later) ./apps/sam2matrix/LICENSE: BSD (3 clause) ./apps/splazers/LICENSE: LGPL (v3) ./apps/razers3/LICENSE: UNKNOWN ./apps/snp_store/LICENSE: *No copyright* LGPL (v3) ./apps/dfi/LICENSE: UNKNOWN ./apps/fiona/LICENSE: UNKNOWN ./apps/yara/LICENSE: BSD (3 clause) ./apps/stellar/LICENSE: LGPL (v3) ./apps/alf/LICENSE: BSD (3 clause) ./apps/sgip/LICENSE: LGPL (v3) ./apps/seqcons2/LICENSE: BSD (3 clause) ./apps/bs_tools/LICENSE: BSD (3 clause) ./apps/fx_tools/LICENSE: BSD (3 clause) ./apps/searchjoin/LICENSE: BSD (3 clause) ./apps/tree_recon/LICENSE: LGPL (v3 or later) ./apps/insegt/LICENSE: BSD (3 clause) ./apps/param_chooser/LICENSE: LGPL (v3) ./apps/mason2/LICENSE: BSD (3 clause) ./apps/micro_razers/LICENSE: LGPL (v3) ./apps/gustaf/LICENSE: BSD (3 clause) ./apps/razers/LICENSE: UNKNOWN ./apps/seqan_tcoffee/LICENSE: LGPL (v3 or later) ./apps/ngs_roi/tool_shed/LICENSE: BSD (3 clause) ./apps/ngs_roi/LICENSE: BSD (3 clause) ./apps/ngs_roi/R/ngsroi/LICENSE: BSD (3 clause) ./apps/samcat/LICENSE: UNKNOWN ./apps/sak/LICENSE: LGPL (v3 or later) ./demos/LICENSE: BSD (3 clause) ./include/seqan/LICENSE: BSD (3 clause) ./util/cmake/ctd/LICENSE: BSD (3 clause) ./util/py_lib/seqan/LICENSE: BSD (3 clause) ./util/skel/app_template/LICENSE: BSD (3 clause) > > > They're different licenses with same file name, here why i chose to rename > > them. There is not problem in my opinion. > > GL at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines says: > > "If the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, > then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must > be included in %license." > > I see no exceptions here. All of them should go into %license, >= 40 files. I don't want copy >= 40 files identical. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
