[Bug 242416] Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=242416





------- Additional Comments From pertusus@xxxxxxx  2007-08-18 05:18 EST -------
3 other questions:

* how did you generate the xpdf tarball?
* why the Build dependencies on texlive-texmf*? There is a comment
  but I don't understand it
* why
  export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=`pwd`/texk/kpathsea/.libs
in %install? Nothing is meant to be compiled at that point.


X-Red-Hat-Extra and Application categories shouldn't be added 
to xdvi.desktop.

in install-info scriptlets the .gz should be removed.

there is still a comment about using internal freetype, although
it seems to be fixed?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]