Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-PDL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226275 ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood@xxxxxxxxxx 2007-08-06 13:33 EST ------- ok, applied your patches, added the additional files to %docs, fixed the 'unescaped % in %changelog' warning, and a non-UTF-8 PDL::Complex.3pm. However, rpmlint is still complaining about: W: perl-PDL unversioned-explicit-provides perl(PDL::Config) etc... And company. Wouldn't it be better to version these with the same version as perl-PDL? also rpmlint complains about: W: perl-PDL devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi/PDL/Core/pdlsimple.h etc... We could probably move these to a perl-PDL-devel package, if they aren't needed at runtime. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review