https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1481645 Petr Viktorin <pviktori@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pviktori@xxxxxxxxxx --- Comment #4 from Petr Viktorin <pviktori@xxxxxxxxxx> --- The first question to ask is: is the Python library useful on its own? Is other software expected to import pyobd as a Python module? See the relevant [Guidelines]. Also, are users expected to write Python extensions for pyobd? (In that case, the py2/py3 distinction would eventually matter.) If this is an Application that just an application that happens to be written in Python. In that case, the name "pyobd" is perfectly fine. Also there's no need to provide parallel-installable python2/python3 versions in the future: just switch to Python 3 entirely. The [Guidelines] cover this case in "Mixed Use Packages": cases 2. and 3. seem appropriate -- and note that for case 2. you don't need to do anything :) If you think of this as a module, *then* the Python packaging guidelines apply. In that case, the rename could fall under a [FPC exception] for Python SIG, so formal re-review might not not needed. Let me know if you want to go that way. [Guidelines]: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Libraries_and_Applications [FPC exception]: https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/685 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
