https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379651 Georg Sauthoff <fedora@xxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora@xxxxxxxx --- Comment #15 from Georg Sauthoff <fedora@xxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Matthias Runge from comment #9) > maybe we should backport the fix they did in django-1.10 to django-1.9 > rather than creating a new package, that is basically a (half) duplicate of > django? I still don't see much value in this package (compared to django > itself) concrete value: if the pelican package would use the pelican-feedgenerator package as intended and tested by the pelican developers those 2 bugs would have been prevented from happening: - Random attribute order in generated feeds (Bug 421185) - python-pelican is shipped with an old version of feedgenerator.py which leads to unexpected behaviour (Bug 1480922) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
