https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1468768 --- Comment #14 from Michael Schwendt <bugs.michael@xxxxxxx> --- > The /usr/share data is required by the app at runtime. Splitting it into > a sub-package would net zero gains. Additionality this clause has been > removed from the Guidelines. I can't find it. The benefit would be for the repository and its mirrors, _if_ it's a huge (!) "noarch" subpackage that can be hardlinked between multiple repositories to save space. It has never been in the official guidelines, since it's a minor detail only. And similar to the "large documentation must go into a -doc subpackage" guideline, deciding when data are sufficiently "large enough" is troublesome. Creating too many small subpackages is not without pitfalls (such as repo metadata bloat / user needs to search for the documentation package). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
