https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1433617 --- Comment #6 from Peter Oliver <mavit@xxxxxxxxxxxx> --- SRPM URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/mavit/python-proselint/fedora-26-x86_64/00574757-python-proselint/python-proselint-0.8.0-2.fc26.src.rpm > Also as per guidelines python packages should be prefixed with python[23] There are lots of applications that happen to be implemented in Python where the package name isn't prefixed; ansible, for example. I don't think that the implementation language is interesting or helpful to the person installing the package. > Is creating an extra package really required? If both packages are providing same functionality. Can't you ship both python2 and python3 with the binary? I think what's happening here is that you're thinking of this a Python library that happens to include a binary, and I'm thinking of this as an application that happens to depend on an included Python library. Actually, I'm not aware of anything that uses the library except for the application. Perhaps the best way to simplify this is to not build anything for Python 2, and to put everything in a single package? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
