https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1468971 --- Comment #5 from Qixiang Wan <qwan@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Qixiang Wan from comment #4) > (In reply to Igor Gnatenko from comment #3) > > (In reply to Qixiang Wan from comment #2) > > > Hi Igor, > > > > > > Thanks for your comments, the remaining python-* packages are all available > > > in python-* prefix only which I checked in fedora koji build system. > > pyOpenSSL -> python2-pyOpenSSL > > python-six -> python2-six > > python-sqlalchemy -> python2-sqlalchemy > > ... > > I see, I only checked the package name, but they are available as > sub-packages. I will check all these python-* packages. Thanks for pointing > this out. > Had another check against these python-* packages: python-enum34: Latest build doesn't has python2-enum34, only old versions has python2-enum, so doesn't need to change this. python-fedora: Latest build has python2-fedora on fedora >= 24, but not actually available even in fedora 25 updates, so I'd like to keep python-fedora. pyOpenSSL: Latest build has python2-pyOpenSSL on fedora >= 26, but since fedora 26 is not GA yet, I'd like to keep pyOpenSSL and update it after 26 GA if necessary. python-six, python-sqlalchemy: similar to pyOpenSSL, there are only python2- versions for them from fedora 26. python-flask-script, python-httplib2, python-munch: All available with python-* packages only. Based on that, I think it's unnecessary to change the existing remaining python-* packages at this moment. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
