https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1451138 Satish Balay <balay@xxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |balay@xxxxxxxxxxx --- Comment #1 from Satish Balay <balay@xxxxxxxxxxx> --- [this is not a review - but feedback] balay@asterix /home/balay/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64 $ rpm -qlp libomp-4.0.0-1.fc26.x86_64.rpm /usr/lib64/libomp.so balay@asterix /home/balay/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64 $ rpm -qlp libomp-devel-4.0.0-1.fc26.x86_64.rpm /usr/include/omp.h balay@asterix /home/balay/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64 $ The location of these files does not look correct. I would think /usr/include/omp.h would conflict with omp.h from gomp Looking at gomp organization I see: balay@asterix /home/balay $ locate libgomp.so /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/7/libgomp.so /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/7/32/libgomp.so /usr/lib64/libgomp.so.1 /usr/lib64/libgomp.so.1.0.0 balay@asterix /home/balay $ locate /omp.h /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/7/include/omp.h balay@asterix /home/balay $ So presumably clang omp include/libraries should be installed in clang include/library locations? Here is how llvm binary distribution is packaged balay@asterix /home/balay/soft $ find clang+llvm-4.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-debian8 -type f -name omp.h clang+llvm-4.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-debian8/lib/clang/4.0.0/include/omp.h balay@asterix /home/balay/soft $ find clang+llvm-4.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-debian8 -type f -name "libomp*" clang+llvm-4.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-debian8/lib/libomp.so balay@asterix /home/balay/soft $ And perhaps the package should have a llvm prefix - say llvm-libomp? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
